Howard: November 2007 Archives
Nine Australians are believed to be among thousands of people who are unaware a once-promising vaccine for AIDS has increased their infection risk, after they participated in clinical trials around the world.The multinational trials involving more than 3,000 HIV-negative volunteers were cancelled in September after a large-scale study found the vaccine was not effective at preventing infection.
Researchers have this morning revealed far worse news - those who received the V520 vaccine are more susceptible to acquiring the AIDS virus.
It is understood nine of the 18 people from Sydney involved in the study were given the HIV vaccine but do not know.
The volunteers were warned to protect themselves from exposure to AIDS but were not told if they were administered the vaccine or the inactive placebo.
The information was kept secret to minimise biases in the study.
Scientists will decide over the next 10 days whether those involved in the trial should be told about whether they were given the vaccine or not.
US pharmaceutical giant Merck, which helped develop V520, says volunteers can opt out of the study now and be told if they were given the HIV vaccine.
All but one of the infections were in male volunteers and the bulk of those infected were homosexual men.
Scientists baffled
The study started 18 months ago after 20 years of research and development to get the vaccine to human trials.
Its chief researcher in Australia, Dr Tony Kelleher from the University of New South Wales, told ABC reporter Karen Barlow in May last year there was no chance for the vaccine to cause HIV infection because it carried so little of the virus.
Researchers say that is still the case but somehow things went horribly wrong with the phase-two trial.
Of the people who had the HIV vaccine, 49 became infected with the virus, whereas only 33 in the placebo group became infected.
The vice-president of Merck's research team, Keith Gottesdiener, says the trial was abruptly stopped two months ago because V520 was not preventing infection.
"We are analysing the data to try to determine if the results are due to immune responses induced by the vaccine, differences in study populations, or some other biological phenomenon we don't yet understand, or simply due to chance," he said.
"It will take some time before we understand why the vaccine did not work and why there was a trend toward more cases of infection in volunteers who received the vaccine."
Doctor Larry Corey from the US Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute says its too soon to establish whether the virus caused the increased infection rates.
"One of the possibilities is that the increase in the number of infections could be related to the vaccine, there are many other possibilities as well," he said.
"My own opinion is that it's way too early to really answer and the data is way too complex and there's no simple answer to that question."
Cold virus
The trial vaccine used a disabled form of the common-cold virus to carry three synthetically produced HIV genes into the body.
It appears people who had higher levels of immune protection against the virus before getting the vaccine were at highest risk of acquiring HIV.
The vaccine did not contain live HIV. It had been well tolerated in smaller clinical trials and had produced immune responses.
The trial was also conducted in North America, South America, the Caribbean and South Africa.
- ABC/AFP
[via ABC News Australia]
Religious and personal objection forms not included in information pack, police followed advocacy reporters to bathroom, kids herded in line to take shots with no regard to medical or vaccine historyParents of children in Prince George's County Maryland were kept in the dark about their right to opt out of vaccines as over a thousand kids were herded into a courthouse to be injected while authorities kept a close watch on advocacy groups and reporters who tried to inform parents that there was no law to mandate the shots.
Parents were threatened with fines and jail time last week if they failed to have their children immunized, after schools kicked out kids for not taking the Hepatitis B vaccine.
According to observers who were able to gain access to the courthouse, children with a history of medical issues were not properly screened as parents were simply told to get in line and have their kids take the shots.
"Many of those in line said their children were properly immunized, but the school system had misplaced the records. They said efforts to get the paperwork straightened out beforehand had been futile," reported the Associated Press.
In the following video, Kelli Ann Davis, a member of SafeMinds, a national autism advocacy organization, whose son Miles was diagnosed with autism in 2002 as a result of mercury poisoning from vaccines, relates how she was also followed by police with dogs to the bathroom after being told she "was not one of them".
She also explains how the information packs handed out to parents before they lined up to have their kids take the shots failed to include waiver forms giving parents the right to opt out due to personal, religious or medical reasons.
State Attorney Glenn Ivey, who admitted during a radio interview last week that no law mandated the shots and also that he had chosen not to give his kids the vaccines, confirmed that exemption forms were available from the back of the room. However, when asked if they were aware of the right to opt out, parents were miffed. News reports failed to cite any cases where parents had opted out as a result of signing waiver forms.
According to an Associated Press report, over a thousand children were vaccinated on Saturday, leaving around 1100 who did not show up to the courthouse. The fact that mandatory shots were being doled out in court after parents had been threatened with arrest, reminiscent of some nightmarish science fiction horror movie, and potentially dangerous in itself, was also overlooked by mainstream news coverage.
On Friday, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons condemned the case as a "vaccine roundup."
Children should be carefully screened, medical records taken and decisions made carefully - not in an ad hoc assembly-line clinic in a county courtroom and under the brutal watch of law enforcement. This is a man-made disaster ready and waiting to detonate. Children could receive a dangerous cocktail of several vaccines without proper examinations. "The procedure is reckless and subjects children to the risk of severe reactions. Physicians would not be allowed to treat children in this way, without individual histories and physical exams - or informed consent," said Jane M. Orient, M.D., AAPS Executive Director.
AAPS also pointed out a blatant conflict of interest, highlighting the fact that the school district is set to lose a windfall in state funding unless students comply with the vaccine order.
With the state still hell-bent of getting over a thousand other children to take the shots, this case is far from over, and charges that parents have been subject to an intimidation campaign while not being properly informed of the exemption process will continue.
[via Prison Planet]
I have started cataloging videos and documentaries specifically related to the dangers of vaccines here:
Here is a collection of videos various parents of autistic children have made about the damage vaccines have done to their kids, including before and after vaccination videos:
Finally, here is a collection of other videos related to vaccination:
by Paul Joseph Watson
Concerned parents across the U.S. are leading a nationwide revolt against unnecessary, untested and dangerous vaccines as CDC records show a growing amount of religious exemptions on vaccine forms, following a media blitz by Jenny McCarthy in which she blamed a vaccine for causing her son's autism.
Far from the biased and prejudiced context in which the Associated Press headline framed it - 'Parents take a shot at lying on vaccine forms' - the move comes as a result of increased understanding and education about the dangers of vaccines.
Most recently, actress and model Jenny McCarthy's appearance on the Oprah Winfrey show and numerous other prime time TV programs has spurred women to seriously investigate the link between autism in babies and young children and vaccinations.
McCarthy's new book, Louder than Words: A Mother's Journey in Healing Autism, is partly about her contention that her son's autism was caused primarily by a combined vaccination administered around the age of 18 months.
McCarthy discusses her book and the link between autism and vaccines on The View, ABC's flagship daytime show.
Increased sensitivity about immunization is also a consequence of the growing awareness of the fact that vaccines are not mandatory - a hoax played out by authorities across the U.S., most recently by Texas Governor Rick Perry in the case of the HPV vaccine .
In that instance, a media propaganda bandwagon aided in disseminating the myth that the untested and dangerous shot that has already been linked with devastating side-effects, which Perry and his cronies were bought off to peddle by Merck, had become "the law" despite the fact that Perry's executive order only "recommended" that parents give their kids the vaccine.
There is no law in America, aside from those applying to medical workers, that says you or your child has to take any vaccine whatsoever, no matter what any executive order, requirement, mandate or policy dictates, there is no situation where you can go to prison for refusing a government vaccine under the U.S. constitution and the law of the land.
The mass media drumbeat constantly conditions people to believe that if they don't take their shots they will be kicked out of school, arrested and thrown in jail. This trick will continue to hoodwink Americans into taking all manner of dangerous and untested vaccines, the number of which rises every year, until they realize that there is no law that forces them to take any vaccine .
Mercury is still being added to vaccines at completely unsafe levels considering the fact that it is a known neuro-toxin. A recent study undertaken by the University of Calgary unveiled concrete evidence that mercury ions alter the cell-membrane of developing neurons in babies and young children, directly contributing to autism (watch above).
Autism rates have exploded in the U.S. but researchers have noticed that there are no instances of the disease in the Amish community and virtually no cases reported in the third world.
Vaccines and drugs that are not stringently tested and are instead foisted upon populations for the purposes of making obscene profits have a clear history of deadly consequences.
Consider the case of Bayer Pharmaceuticals, who deliberately dumped a vaccine that was known to be contaminated with AIDS virus on the European and Latin American market after it killed people in America. Thousands died from an action that the U.S. government allowed to happen through the FDA.
Peruse the plethora of examples where vaccines containing mercury, live HIV virus, live cancer and other horrors have wrought misery after victims were bullied into taking them by government mandates that they were deluded into thinking was the law.
The history alone, a legacy that led former director of the National Institute of Health Dr. James R. Shannon to state, "The only safe vaccine is one that is never used," implores us to educate others on the dangers of vaccines and ensure that similar executive orders such as Rick Perry's in Texas are not passed elsewhere in the country as a result of cynical greed driven lobbying and corporate crony payoffs.
Parents across the country are beginning to realize that the explosion in rates of childhood autism, ADHD and other illnesses are directly caused by the ever-increasing number of dangerous and untested vaccinations that overwhelm a child's immune system with deadly toxins and poisons like mercury.
The national revolt against dangerous vaccines is growing apace but it is likely to be countered by a PR backlash on behalf of pharmaceutical giants and the government in an attempt to scare parents into believing that all vaccinations are necessary and that it is against the law to block their child from receiving them. It is down to us to help educate parents about the lethal history of vaccinations and why their number should be drastically reduced, especially for infants and children.
via [Prison Planet]
Part 1:
Dr. Blaylock’s Testimony
July 08, 2004
Family Court Matter 2002-006149
Dr. Blaylock: A board certified neurosurgeon, practiced for twenty-six years, a clinical assistant professor of neurosurgery—school of medicine for fifteen years, clinical assistant professor of neurosurgery at University of Mississippi Medical Center for ten years, I’ve published three books, chapters in three medical text books on various medical subjects dealing with the nervous system, I’ve published 30 articles in peer-review journals, and I continue to publish and write on the subject of anything that effects the brain and my primary interest is the effect of over vaccination on brain function.
Nichols: Doctor is those writings been subject to peer-review?
Blaylock: Yes, all of them are in peer review journals
Nichols: And those journals are medical and scientific type journals, correct?
|
The following hearings on real one player |
Blaylock: Correct
Nichols: Have you reviewed recommendations that have been authored by the Centers of Disease Control on these issues?
Blaylock: No
Nichols: In your years of practice could you give the court an approximation of the amount of patients that you’ve dealt with in these types of areas?
Blaylock: Well, generally what I would see was patients who had neurological injuries from vaccinations or diseases related to the vaccinations
Nichols: I would tender the doctor as an expert
Mark: We have no objections
Judge: Ok, we’ll accept his testimony
Mark: However, we object entirely to his testimony
Judge: Objection noted, go ahead…state your objection
Mark: relevancy…we’ve heard this before
Judge: Objection noted
Mark: Thank-you
Judge: Go ahead
Nichols: Have you, doctor been provided knowledge of six year old Hutchinson ’s health status in this matter?
Blaylock: Briefly, yes
Nichols: And that of five year old Greyson Hutchinson?
Blaylock: To some degree, yes.
Nichols: And you’ve reviewed the subjects children’s health information, is that correct?
Blaylock: I have not reviewed their medical information through their medical chart
Nichols: How have you reviewed it?
Blaylock: Basically what the mother of the children provided me.
Nichols: What did she provide you?
Blaylock: She told me about the vaccinations, how they were done, what vaccines they received, the manufacturers of the particular vaccines and some of the health changes that have occurred in the children following the vaccinations
Nichols: Have you reviewed the existing medical scientific literature on the issue of giving multiple vaccinations?
Blaylock: Yes, I recently published three papers on this issue
Nichols: Have you reviewed existing medical scientific literature on the risks of certain diseases at these ages of five and six?
Blaylock: Yes
Nichols: Have you reached an opinion of giving multiple vaccinations at one office visit to these type of children?
Mark: Excuse me….
Dr. Blaylock, this is Mark Cord I represent the father in this case. Before rendering your expert opinion in this case, I want to make it clear, did you ever physically examine Greyson or Gwyneth, the party’s two children?
Blaylock: No
Mark: Did you eve talk to them?
Blaylock: No
Mark: So your opinions are based entirely on the reports of their mother Mrs. Janet Burton, is that correct?
Blaylock: Well, my expertise in the area of over vaccinations, multiple vaccinations
Mark: If relevant factors are omitted or misrepresented to you by Mrs. Burton then your conclusions can be flawed as well, is that true?
Blaylock: Only if she misrepresented the fact that they received at least eleven vaccinations at once or multiple vaccinations at one office visit. That’s the pertinent point.
Mark: Do you know beyond a reasonable degree of medical probability in this case that an older sister as you described in your report had a seizure resulting from a similar vaccination?
Blaylock: I was told that by the mother as far as the history she gave me.
Mark: You don’t know if that’s true or not?
Blaylock: No more if she came to my office and told me that I would have to believe because that’s part of medical history
Mark: Did you examine any medical records to confirm that alleged fact of her sister’s seizure?
Blaylock: No
Mark: No further questions
Nichols: Doctor my last question with you was have you reviewed existing scientific medical literature on the risks of certain diseases at the ages of these children?
Blaylock: Yes
Nichols: And have you reached an opinion regarding the issue of giving multiple vaccinations at one office visit for these children?
Mark: Your honor I must object…
Judge: Over ruled, go ahead doctor
Blaylock: Yes, I reviewed the literature
Nichols: And you’ve reached an opinion of giving multiple vaccinations at one office visit to these children?
Blaylock: Yes
Nichols: And have you reached an opinion regarding the risks of the diseases vaccinated for at these ages?
Blaylock: Yes
Nichols: And did you rely on your evaluation of the existing scientific body of knowledge in these areas in forming these opinions?
Blaylock: Yes, that and the recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control
Nichols: Okay, what is your opinion in these regards
Blaylock: Well, according to the literature of the Centers for Disease Control the HIB vaccination was not indicated, the Pneumococcal vaccine was not indicated
Nichols: Were those to your knowledge administered?
Blaylock: Did I know they were administered?
Nichols: To your knowledge is it reported to you that those vaccines were indeed administered to these children?
Blaylock: Yes
Nichols: And what is the impact in your opinion of undertaking that type of activity?
Blaylock: Well, it put them at all the risks associated with vaccinations, every vaccination is a risk, some of which are devastating. Death is listed as a possible complication. And there’s long-term neurological injury. It’s listed as a complication for both of these vaccines. The HIB vaccine is known to produce immune suppression and some literature indicates it may actually increase the risk of developing Haemophilus influenza meningitis. So that would be another contraindication for giving it but there’s no indication from the medical literature or from the Centers for Disease Control for ever giving this vaccine after age five.
Nichols: Did you develop you opinion for the court in the area of the advisability of this type of multiple vaccinations being administered?
Blaylock: There’s no reason to give these vaccines together or at once except for the convenience of the physician, but there’s a lot of medical literature particularly in the area of brain injury for not doing it. Recent evidence strongly suggests that giving that many vaccines at once can produce not only acute injury to the brain but chronic injury to the brain. The adjuvants that are added, particularly aluminum, there’s a literature now coming out particularly out of France , Belgium and Germany they’ve described over two hundred cases of macrophalgicphalitis and an associated Demyelination of the nervous system occurring both in adults and in children. Over sixty-six cases reported that has shown to be due to the aluminum in the vaccine. Aluminum hydroxide at the injection site acts as a source of continued immune stimulation produces hyper stimulation and this results as a neurological damage and this can occur as long as eight years after the injection.
Nichols: In your report doctor you discuss the notion of excitotoxicty. Could you explain that briefly to the court?
Blaylock: Excitotoxicity is basically the process where by brain cells become over excited. It’s considered to be the central mechanism of all nerve degenerative diseases, stroke brain trauma, any sort of injury to the brain, infection, inflammation of the brain. The destructive process is the excitotoxic process. Basically, what this does, it can destroy the connections between the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord. Cause the process called dendrites to retract and if it’s intense enough it’ll destroy the brain cells themselves. We know this is highly correlated with aluminum and that the aluminum from these vaccines accumulates in the brain in concentrations that can result in this. This process is associated with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Lou Gerhig’s Disease. Infact, ALS has been associated with a vaccine in a child. Parkinson’s disease has been connected to vaccines in children. And so we have good scientific evidence of this excitotoxic process occurring with the vaccination process. In these three articles I review extensive neuroscience literature showing how the process works. That when you give a lot of vaccines at once, particularly these power immune adjuvants added to each vaccine it over stimulates the body’s immunity and that in turn stimulates the brain’s immune cell call the microglia. When this cell is over stimulated particularly for long periods of time it secretes two known excitotoxins: glutamate and _____ acid and this has been shown to cause the destruction of these processes. …The brain itself does not get infected with the HIB virus. Only the microglia stimulated. And that produces the destruction of the brain and this is what you’re doing to varying degrees in the vaccination process. If you over vaccinate you over stimulate this system in the brain you begin to destroy neurons. And the effect depends on the intensity. If it’s a very intense effect you can get diseases like sub acute sclerosis advanced encephalitis which occurs after the measles vaccine in which the child’s nervous system is demialiated and has 100% mortality. On the other end of the spectrum you can have mild behavioral changes, you can have autism, ADD. All of these things are associated with this process.
Nichols: As you mentioned with ADD, would hyperactivity be an indication of adverse reaction.
Blaylock: Yes, infact, in the physician’s desk reference and in the CDC literature these are the reactions that are listed. If you look at the MMR complications listed in the Physician’s Desk Reference put out by the company itself adverse reactions include numerous neurological things: encephalitis, encephalopathy, measles included by the encephalitis, Guillain-Barre, paralysis, febral convulsions, a-febral convulsions…all these things are listed complications of the MMR vaccine. We have similar warnings against some of the other vaccines that unfortunately most parents are not properly informed of these complications. They’re not informed about the adjuvants and the effects on the brain. They’re not told that human albumin is used in these vaccines for some of them and fetal bovine serum. And that there is a risk from developing Mad Cow Disease from these vaccines. A recent study found that the bovine serum actually came, or significant lots of it came during the peak of the Mad Cow crisis in England and that THAT bovine serum was used to make vaccines for the United States . And May still be used.
Nichols: Did you receive the list of vaccines that were administered to the subject children?
Blaylock: Yes
Nichols: And did you notice any indications from that list of vaccines that were administered that would indicate that it was from bad lots?
Blaylock: You’d have to check with the company to look at the lots. They have the lot numbers. But the manufacturers themselves, according to their own vaccine contain these things. For instance, GlaxoSmithKline DTaP contains aluminum hydroxide.
Nichols: Was that administered to these children?
Blaylock: According to this list the mother provided me. She told me she got this from the medical chart. And according to the Physician’s Desk Reference it contains bovine extract. They give a warning about the possibility of Mad Cow Disease being transmitted. They do not give the warnings about aluminum hydroxide, but this is producing chronic diseases, as I said, in a large number of people in Europe . They say it’s a growing epidemic. So, this is a major problem. Two children have been described with this aluminum induced syndrome, which has developed serious neurological problems. One had developmental delay the other one had signs of neurological injury. More children are being described in neurological literature from Denmark , Germany and France .
Nichols: Would constricted throat be an indication of adverse reaction?
Blaylock: Because of the immune reaction…. it could produce all sorts of problems. Constricted throat could be an allergic reaction to some of the components in the vaccines. It’s not just the viruses or the bacteria that’s there. Like I said, it’s immune adjuvants. These include oils, polysaccharides; they contain metals to stimulate the immune system. Any of these could produce system of wide array. Nausea and vomiting, is listed as one of the problems associated with MMR. Pancreatitis, GI gastrointestinal symptoms have been listed as complications from this vaccine.
Nichols: Dilated pupils?
Blaylock: In this report that came from the South Florida Hospital , which was reported in the Journal of Pediatric Development Pathology. One of the children that was five years old was given the MMR vaccine and developed pupillary reflex abnormality and signs of diffused ___ and what that means is that the ___nervous system has been injured by the vaccine process and the aluminum…So …could produce dilated fixed pupils, hypersensitivity to light. So that would certainly fit that syndrome.
Nichols: Your opinion on the advisability on administering these types of vaccines to these particular children.
Blaylock: Based on my review. Out of the vaccines. The following four should never have been given: The chickenpox, the HIB, the Hep B and the Pneumococcal vaccine. There’s no indication for them. The chickenpox vaccine, according to the CDC itself, the only reason to give it is for convenience of the mother so that she won’t miss work taking care of the child. It’s not due to the epidemic complication problem. It’s not due to high neurological or death rate in children. Chickenpox is a relatively begnin disease in children. So that can be eliminated. The HIB, as I said, at age five there’s no risk of HIB infection whatsoever. The Pneumococcal vaccine at age five, there’s no risk of Pneumococcal meningitis listed at all. And for the Hepatitis B, according to CDC and all the literature, the only reason they give it to children is because it’s a captive audience. Those with no risk are a child whose parents are not drug users or HIV infected. So that vaccine is not indicated unless there’s a family history of drug use or of HIV infections.
Nichols: Advisability or necessity of going back and providing booster shots once the initial round has been given.
Blaylock: I would not do it. I think it’s hazardous. If we look at most of the really bad neurological reactions to vaccines most of them occurred on the second or third exposure. So the second exposure is much more likely to produce adverse effects because you’re adding not only acute immune stimulation from the time of the vaccine but you’re adding more aluminum hydroxide…which is going to produce a larger burdens that will last for years producing chronic immune stimulation. There is excellent evidence that THAT produces brain injury. In the case of autism they have shown that the MMR vaccine possibly because of either the thimerosal or the aluminum adjuvant has been shown to produce immune reactions to the seritonin receptors in the brain. So, that’s been proven beyond a doubt. So, we know that there are cases in which autism and other developmental diseases of children can occur following vaccination.
Nichols: Doctor, given the hypothetical that these children might have a half sibling older half sibling that experienced grand mal seizures shortly after receiving vaccinations would that have any impact on the risk pool where these children would fall in terms of vaccination process?
Blaylock: Well it could. It depends on the cause of the seizure in a child. If they inherited a gene from the mother that put that child at risk to produce the seizure sensitivity it could very well also have been inherited by these two children. And then have put them at risk as well.
Nichols: If that occurs here and then the advisability in your opinion of proceeding with this vaccination process?
Blaylock: I think that’d be a highly hazardous thing to do if there’s a seizure risk. And in every vaccine according to CDC and manufacturers that’s an absolute contraindication of giving the vaccines. The other thing is really important consideration is that any child that has immune deficiency in any way is considered a contraindication to vaccination. They are discovering now that more children have immune deficiencies that are unrecognized by the pediatrician. And therefore they’re at risk. So if you insist, and the court decide that way, these children should have immune testing to make sure their immunity is normal. Because if we know that they already have a hyper immune response and you re-immunize them you’re almost certain to produce neurological damage. And that’s the general in several studies.
Nichols: In terms of taking the children on extended cruise within forty-eight hours or seventy-two hours after the children have indicated some tendency towards adverse reaction. What would be the advisability of that?
Blaylock: Well, if we go by the parent’s guide to childhood immunization, which is put out by the CDC national immunization program. For instance, on the MMR vaccine it says (I’m reading directly from the report) febral seizures, seizures caused by fever in cases of children who’ve gotten MMR vaccines, these usually happens within one to two weeks after the shot…So, the warning by the CDC is that children may very well develop a seizure as long as two weeks after they’re vaccinated. That’s with a single vaccine. When you’re vaccinating with eleven vaccines that risk goes up many fold.
Nichols: So, you’re answer to my question the advisability on vaccinating the children on May the 12th and then taking them on a cruise to Alaska from Phoenix Arizona on the May the 15th.
Blaylock: I think that would be hazardous particularly with eleven vaccines and the CDC recommending watching and waiting of a period of two weeks. They should have a minimum of two-week observation before they leave their home base…being on a cruise ship where all you have is a cruise ship doctor. How is he going to take care of a major neurological anaphylactoid reaction of a child or a grand mal seizure?
Nichols: Thank-you doctor, no further questions.
Judge: Cross counsel?
Nichols: I would move simply to the adminission of exhibit number fourteen. That is the doctor’s report.
Judge: Did this doctor examine these children?
Nichols: This doctor made his opinions as recommendations based upon the information that was provided him.
Judge: Your position?
Mark: Your honor, we move reserve our right to object to the doctor’s entire testimony…
Judge: I will address the admissibility of that later
Mark: Doctor what is the percentage risk of these children going on a cruise that they’re going to contract any seizure?
Blaylock: We don’t have a percentage because we don’t have a study of eleven vaccinations in one child. No one’s done a study to see the risks of such vaccinations on a child. To me eleven vaccines at once is almost unprecedented. So, we have an unusual case where these children have been over vaccinated. Exposed to a very extreme risk of neurological damage. And I would say that their risk is much higher than a child who had one or two vaccines.
Mark: But you can’t tell us to a reasonable degree of medical probability what that risk is, can you?
Blaylock: There is a reasonable risk. There’s no studies available. But because these children have had eleven vaccines. Eleven doses of very powerful immune adjuvants and the effect that we know it has on the brain the risk is much higher.
Mark: You cannot tell us what the degree of risk is though.
Blaylock: I can’t give you the exact percentage for the reasons I just told you.
Mark: You can’t tell us if it’s a 90 to one, five million to one, or one in a hundred.
Blaylock: Well, we know it’s a lot higher than that. Just from the reports that the company itself puts out.
Mark: Let’s talk about the population that you talked about in the past that had lethal reactions to these immunization shots. What percentage where people died?
Blaylock: Well, let’s take the hepatitis B vaccine for instance. The study done by the National Vaccine Information Center of reactions to the hepatitis B vaccine. They got 24,775 adverse reactions: 9,673 were serious, 439 deaths. That was during an eight-year period between July 1990 through October 1998. Now that’s six times higher than the national death rate from the disease itself. 200% increase death as compared to the natural disease.
Mark: Doctor aren’t we missing one critical factor here? That is, what was the population of these 439 people? What was that?
Blaylock: This is the number of complications reported from the vaccine.
Mark: How many doses of the vaccine were administered?
Blaylock: What difference does that make to the 439 people that died? Each one of those is an individual. Each one died. Does it matter to them that you gave this vaccine to two million, twenty million, thirty million people? Those 439 people are dead.
Mark: I think it does and I think we have a recent example of that it’s called the polio vaccine. How many people were immunized for polio? And how many people died from them? Do you know those statistics?
Blaylock: What we found with the polio (and this occurred in the United States and Great Britain ) the death rate from polio was beginning to fall dramatically before the population was ever vaccinated. What the vaccine people knew they took credit for. They’ve never explained why it had fallen except for the fact that of improved sanitation, better diet, better nutrition. What happened to the vaccine was that after the vaccine was introduced all the cases of polio were caused from the vaccine itself. Right now in Nigeria , the Nigerian people refusing to take the vaccine from the World Health Organization because all the cases of polio in Nigeria are caused by the vaccine itself. This is why the vaccine was suddenly transferred from a live vaccine to a killed vaccine. That’s because they knew that over the thirty year period every case of polio in this country was from the vaccine itself. Now children were forced to get this vaccine. They’re paralyzed. Their lives are ruined and no one took any action for almost forty years. We also know that 98 million people in this country were infected with the SV40 virus from contaminated polio vaccines and it is responsible for numerous brain tumors in children as well as mesothelioma. Now, it took forty years for the opposition to have so much evidence thrown at them that they finally admitted that this was a carcinogenic virus, that they knew from the beginning that this vaccine was contaminated yet they went ahead and gave 98 million children a virus that causes cancer.
Mark: So, Doctor…I forget my question. Salk is a charlotten and polio vaccination is a hoax, is that what you’re telling us?
Blaylock: Well, all you have to do is look at the records. It’s not denied. No one is denying this information. It’s all a matter of record.
Mohammed Ali Al-Bayati
Ph.D., DABT, DABVT
Toxicologist & Pathologist
Toxi-Health International
150 Bloom Dr.
Dixon, CA 95620
Phone: (707) 678-4484
Fax: (707) 678-8505
maalbayati@toxi-health.com
http://www.toxi-health.com
Date of preparation
June 7, 2004
Summary
Greyson and Gwyneth Hutchinson were perfectly healthy children prior to May 12, 2004 when each of them received eleven vaccines in one single visit to a health care provider. Greyson is a five year and two month old white male and his sister; Gwyneth is a six year and 10 month old female. They developed significant health problems after receiving the vaccines listed in Table 1.
Their mother, Janet Burton has consulted with me as a toxicologist and a pathologist with expertise in the area of adverse reactions to vaccines to evaluate the following.
1) Her children’s vaccination records and their adverse reactions to vaccines.
2) The validity of the vaccination procedure and the compatibility of these vaccines with the ages of her children.
3) The synergistic actions among vaccines given to her children in causing adverse reactions.
4) The health problems that can be caused by vaccinating Greyson and Gwyneth a second time on June 12, 2004.
5) The predisposing factors that might increase her children’s risk to be injured by vaccines.
Furthermore, Janet requested that I provide recommendations for clinical tests that monitor her children’s adverse reactions to vaccines and my opinions on the risk versus benefit from vaccinating her children in the future. I described the children’s vaccination history and their symptoms induced by the vaccines given in Section I. A list of some of the adverse reactions described in the medical literature of vaccines given to Janet’s children is presented in Section II. Section III contains a list of problems with the protocol used by the health care provider who vaccinated Greyson and Gwyneth on May 12, 2004. My conclusions and recommendations are outlined in Section IV.
The following are my specific recommendations dealing with the issues of giving Greyson and Gwyneth vaccines in the future and monitoring the damages caused by the vaccines given on May 12, 2004.
1) These children should not be given PCV and Hib vaccines again because these vaccines are approved and recommended for children at the ages of 2-15 months.
2) These children should not be vaccinated on June 12, 2004 as planned by their health care provider or in the near future without assessing the damage caused by the vaccines given on May 12, 2004.
3) The medical records of their older sister who developed seizures after receiving the second dose of MMR at the age of 6 years should be evaluated prior to vaccinating these children. The sister’s medical records should be evaluated by an expert in the area of adverse reactions to vaccines to assess the risk of these children developing serious neurological problems following vaccination.
4) The parents of these children and other caretakers should be consulted prior to giving these children vaccines and they should be given instructions to report adverse reactions to vaccines to the treating physicians.
5) The levels of aluminum and mercury should be determined in the urine and blood of Greyson and Gwyneth to get an idea about their exposure to these elements present in vaccines.
6) Greyson and Gwyneth should be evaluated by an allergist to determine their levels of sensitization to egg albumin and other components present in vaccines such as antibiotics, proteins, preservatives, and metals (Table 2).
7) Greyson and Gwyneth’s physician should be consulted to order blood analyses that include complete blood cells count (RBC, white blood count and differential cell counts, platelet count); liver and kidney functions panels; clotting factors; electrolyte levels; and glucose levels. These children suffered from dehydration and vaccines are known to cause thrombocytopenia, liver and kidney damage, and diabetes.
8) Greyson and Gwyneth should be evaluated by a neurologist and a hearing specialist to assess any neurological and hearing problem that may be caused by vaccines.
Vaccines, like other medicines, are capable of causing serious health problems in children and adults as described in this report. Giving two healthy children eleven vaccines on a single visit without doing risk/benefit analysis or reviewing the family history for health problems caused by vaccines is not medically justified. In addition, giving these two children who are older than five years of age PCV and Hib vaccines that are recommended for children ages of 2-15 months indicates serous problems with the practices of the health care provider who administered these vaccines. I believe that the practices and the knowledge of this health care provider in the areas of vaccines and treatment of children should be evaluated by a medical board to avoid the occurrence of similar problems in the future.
Section I. Greyson and Gwyneth Hutchinson’s Vaccination History and Descriptions of
Adverse Reactions To Vaccines:
Greyson Hutchinson is a five year and two month old white male (DOB: March 14, 1999). His weight and height are 42 lb and 44 inches, respectively. Gwyneth Hutchinson is a six year and 10 month old white female (DOB: July 3, 1997). Her weight and height are 58 lb and 48 inches, respectively. They live with their parents in Arizona and both were perfectly healthy prior to their vaccination with eleven vaccines on May 12, 2004 [1] .
They were never vaccinated prior to May 12, 2004 based on Janet Burton, their mother, who had a very bad experience with the vaccines when she vaccinated her daughter, Rebekah (Greyson and Gwyneth’s older half-sister) with MMR at the age of 6 years. Their sister developed seizures at nine months after her second dose of MMR. She had grand mal seizures - severe enough to warrant hospitalization twice - for a few years following that event. She was treated with Tegretol and she suffered from adverse reactions to this medication. Rebekah received her first MMR vaccine when she was a toddler. Furthermore, Janet has believed that her children are in perfect health and they have no risk of acquiring health problems from an infectious agent. In this case the risk of her children becoming ill from vaccines will outweigh the benefit of the vaccines.
On May 12, 2004 Greyson and Gwyneth were taken by their father without consulting with their mother to a health care provider, who vaccinated each of them with the eleven vaccines listed in Table 1. These vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the arms and the legs. The general compositions of these vaccines are listed in Table 2. These vaccines include four live virus vaccines (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) and Varicella).
The children were returned to their mother two days after vaccination and she observed the following symptoms resulting from their treatment with the vaccines. Both children showed signs of dehydration and had pain at the vaccine injection sites, which lasted for several days. Greyson displayed behaviors showing signs of hyperactivity for the first time in his life along with unstable body temperatures that made him hot one minute and cold the next. He also had dark circles around his eyes and his pupils were dilated. His appetite was reduced and he felt tired. He slept about two hours in the middle of the day, which is unusual for him. In addition, he had a sore throat, headache and complained of his eyes burning. He seemed forgetful and mentally unclear.
Furthermore, Greyson developed a new rash on both legs, especially his right thigh at six to eight days post vaccination. His mother also noticed two small patches approximately an inch in diameter on the right of his abdomen where the texture of his skin is rough and scaly in appearance. Three weeks later to present time, Greyson became hyperactive. He had spurts of energy that made him uncontrollable or containable and he has compulsive-type behavior.
Gwyneth felt unusually thirsty all afternoon and evening. She felt tired and slept 2 hours in the middle of the afternoon, which was unusual for her. At four to eight days following vaccination, she developed a sore throat and dry hives. Her appetite was reduced and she felt like vomiting after eating a small amount of food. She woke up during the night hysterical with pain in her throat. She was feeling tired and she could hardly dance at her dance class.
Janet Burton, has recently received the records of her children’s vaccination from the health care provider who administered the vaccines to her children. She discovered from reading the records that Greyson and Gwyneth were scheduled to receive additional vaccines on or about June 12, 2004. She was also not consulted on this issue.
Janet has consulted with me as a toxicologist and a pathologist with expertise in the area of adverse reactions to vaccines to evaluate the following:
1) Her children’s vaccination records and their adverse reactions to vaccines.
2) The validity of the vaccination procedure and the compatibility of these vaccines with the ages of her children.
3) The synergistic actions among vaccines given to her children in causing adverse reactions.
4) The health problems that can be caused by vaccinating Greyson and Gwyneth a second time on June 12, 2004.
5) The predisposing factors that might increase her children’s risk to be injured by vaccines.
Furthermore, Janet requested that I provide recommendations for clinical tests that monitor her children’s adverse reactions to vaccines and my opinions on the risk versus benefit from vaccinating her children in future.
I evaluated the medical evidence concerning the vaccination of Greyson and Gwyneth with eleven vaccines on May 12, 2004.
Below are the descriptions of adverse reactions of vaccines given to these children with my opinions and recommendations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1. Vaccines given to Greyson and Gwyneth Hutchinson on May 12/2004
Vaccine Types Producers Lot Numbers given
Diphtheria, Tetanus Toxoids, and SKB 21896A2
A cellular Pertussis (DTaP)
Inactivated Polio vaccine (IPV) SKB 21896A2
Haemophilus Influenzae (Hib) Merck 0341N
Hepatitis B (Hep B) SKB 21896A2
Pneumococcal Conjugate Lederle 495175
Vaccine (PCV)
Measles, mumps & rubella (MMR) Merck 0105N
Varicella Merck 1151M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2. Compositions of vaccines as described in the Physicians’ Desk Reference [2, 3].
Diphtheria & Tetanus Toxoids and a cellular Pertussis (DTaP): Each dose (0.5 mL) contains 0.625 mg aluminum; 25 Diphtheria toxoid; 10 tetanus toxoid; 25 mg pertussis toxin; 25 mg filamentous hemagglutinin; 8 mg pertacin; 2.5 mg 2-phenoxyethanol; 4.5 mg sodium chloride; and 0.1 mg formaldehyde.
Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV): Each 0.5 mL dose contains 40 D antigen units of type 1, 8 D antigen units of type 2, and 32 D antigen units of type 3 poliovirus. Also present are 0.5% of 2-phenoxyethanol and 0.02% of formaldehyde (Preservatives), 5 ng neomycin, 200 ng streptomycin, and 25 ng polymyxin.
Haemophilus Influenzae (Hib): Each 0. 5 mL dose of liquid HIB contain 7.5 microgram of Haemophilus b, 125 microgram of Nisseria menigitids, and 225 microgram of aluminum.
Hepatitis B vaccine: Each 0.5 mL dose contains 0.25 mg aluminum; 10 mg of hepatitis B antigen; 4.5 mg sodium chloride; 0.49 mg disodium phosphate dihydrate; and 0.35 mg sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate.
Pneumococcal vaccine: Each dose (0.5 mL of vaccine) contains a mixture of purified polysaccharides of 23most prevalent or invasive pneumococcal types of Streptococcus Pneumonia dissolved in isotonic saline solution containing 0.25% phenol as preservative.
Measles, Mumps & Rubella (MMR): Each 0.5 ml dose contains not less than, 1000 TCD50 (tissue culture infectious doses) of measles virus: 20,000 TCID50 of mumps virus; and 1000 TCID50 of rubella virus. Each dose of vaccine is calculated to contain sorbitol (14.5 mg), sodium phosphate, sucrose (1.9 mg) sodium chloride, hydrolyzed gelatin (14.5 mg), human albumin (0.3 mg) fetal bovine serum (<1 ppm), and 25 microgram of neomycin.
Varicella virus vaccine: Each 0.5 mL dose containing a minimum of 1350 PFU (plaque forming unit) of Oka/Merck varicella virus and additives.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section II. Adverse reactions to vaccines.
Greyson and Gwyneth were administered eleven vaccines in a single visit on May 12, 2004 (Table 1) even though they were in a perfect health and had minimal or no risk of developing illness from an infectious agent in the near future. In this case the risk of developing serious health problems from these vaccines outweighs the benefit.
Furthermore, two of the vaccines given [pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and Haemophilus influenzae Type b (Hib)] have been approved and recommended only for children between 2 and 15 months of age. Greyson and Gwyneth are healthy and older than five years of age and giving them PCV and Hib has no scientific justification and it does not follow the recommendations presented in the Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR) and provided by the US Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [3-6].
The vaccines given to Greyson and Gwyneth have been known to cause serious adverse reactions in some children. These include: serous allergic reactions, upper and lower respiratory tracts infections, ear infections, fever, encephalitis, neurological problem, deafness, pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, poor appetite, loss of weight, thrombocytopenia, and even death. The followings are the specific reactions that have been reported following receiving individual vaccine or groups of vaccines.
II-A. Measles, Mumps & Rubella (MMR)Vaccines
Serious systemic adverse reactions have been reported in children who received the MMR vaccines. These include malaise, sore throat, cough, rhinitis, headache, dizziness, fever (101-102.9 oF), rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, regional lymphadenopathy, parotitis, orchitis, nerve deafness, vasculitis, otitis media, hearing loss, conjunctivitis, aseptic meningitis, measles, thrombocytopenia, and anaphylaxis [2, page 1820, 7-12].
Koga et al. described a case of a child who developed bilateral acute profound deafness and aseptic meningitis within 14 days after receiving MMR vaccines. The cause of this deafness was presumed to be the mumps vaccination. The basis of the presumption was as follows: The meningitis after MMR vaccination was elicited by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method to be caused by the mumps vaccine. The complication of the central nervous system (CNS) after measles vaccination occurs within 14 days after injection and the onset of vomiting and gait disturbance of the case occurred at 24 days after vaccination [7].
Furthermore, a 7-year old girl developed unilateral total loss of hearing at 13 days following MMR vaccination and the live, attenuated mumps-virus vaccine was suspected to be the cause of the injury [8]. Stewart and Prabhum also reported six individuals, who developed hearing loss after the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) immunization and MMR remained a possible etiology. They stated that any risk associated with attenuated viruses must be weighed against the risks of the natural diseases [9].
Cases of aseptic meningitis associated with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines were sought in thirteen UK health districts following a reported cluster in Nottingham , which suggested a risk of 1 in 4,000 doses. Cases were ascertained by obtaining vaccination records of children with aseptic meningitis diagnosed from cerebrospinal fluid samples submitted to Public Health Laboratories or discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of viral meningitis. Both methods identified vaccination 15-35 days before onset as a significant risk factor and therefore indicative of a causal association. With both, half the aseptic meningitis cases identified in children aged 12-24 months were vaccine-associated with onset 15-35 days after vaccine. This study confirmed that the true risk was substantially higher than suggested by case reports from pediatricians, probably about 1 in 11,000 doses [10].
Furthermore, in Japan, at least 311 meningitis cases suspected to be vaccine-related were identified among 630,157 recipients of the measles-mumps-rubella trivalent (MMR) vaccine. These cases were identified based on the notification of cases and the testing of mumps viruses isolated from cerebrospinal fluid for their relatedness to the vaccine by nucleotide sequence analysis [11].
Also, the Institute of Medicine of the United States of America examined putative serious adverse consequences associated with administration of: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, measles, mumps, and measles-mumps-rubella vaccines, oral polio vaccine and inactivated polio vaccine, hepatitis B vaccines, and Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) vaccines. The committee spent 18 months reviewing all available scientific and medical data from individual case reports (published and unpublished) to controlled clinical trials.
The committee found that the evidence favored acceptance of a causal relationship between diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and Guillain-Barre syndrome and brachial neuritis; between measles vaccine and anaphylaxis; between oral polio vaccine and Guillain-Barre syndrome; and between unconjugated Hib vaccine and susceptibility to Hib disease. The committee also found that the evidence established causality between diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and anaphylaxis; between the measles vaccine and death from measles vaccine-strain viral infection; between measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and thrombocytopenia and anaphylaxis; between the oral polio vaccine and poliomyelitis and death from polio vaccine-strain viral infection; and between the hepatitis B vaccine and anaphylaxis [12].
II-B. Varicella virus vaccine
In addition to the MMR vaccine, Greyson and Gwyneth received the varicella vaccine. The following is a list of the most frequently reported adverse reactions in children ages 1-12 years, who received the varicella vaccine. These illnesses include: upper respiratory illness, cough, irritability, nervousness, fatigue, diarrhea, loss of appetite, vomiting, otitis media, diaper rash/contact rash, headache, teething, malaise, abdominal pain, skin rash, nausea, eye complaints, chills, lymphadenopathy, malagia, lower respiratory illness, allergic reactions (including allergic rash and hives), stiff neck, heat rash, arthralgia, eczema/dry skin/dermatitis, constipation, and itching. Furthermore, in a study consisting of 8,827 children who received the varicella vaccine, fever (102 oF) developed in 14.7% between 0-42 days [2, page 1910].
II-C. Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib)
Haemophilus influenzae Type b (Hib)] has been approved and recommended only for children between 2 and 15 months of age. Greyson and Gwyneth are healthy and older than five years of age and giving them PCV and Hib has no scientific justification and it does not follow the recommendations presented in the Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR) and provided by the US Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [3, 6].
Three hundred sixty-five infants were inoculated with Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib), and some of them developed systemic adverse reactions [2, 3]. In addition, Classen and Classen analyzed data from a Hib vaccine trial and identified clusters of extra cases of insulin dependent diabetes (IDDM) caused by the vaccine that occurred between 36 and 48 months post-immunization [13].
Furthermore, approximately 116,000 children in Finland were randomized to receive 4 doses of the Hib vaccine beginning at 3 months of age or one dose starting after 24 months of age. A control-cohort included all 128,500 children born in Finland in the 24 months prior to the Hib vaccine study. The difference in cumulative incidence between those receiving 4 doses and those receiving 0 doses is 54 cases of IDDM/100,000 (P = 0.026) at 7- year (relative risk = 1.26).
Most of the extra cases of IDDM appeared in statistically significant clusters that occurred in periods starting, at approximately 38 months after immunization and lasting approximately 6-8 months [20]. In a second study, distinct rises in the incidence of IDDM in children occurred 2-4 years following the introduction of the MMR and pertussis vaccines [14].
II-D. Diphtheria, Tetanus Toxoids, and a cellular Pertussis (DTaP)
In the USA, reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), concerning infant immunization against pertussis between January 1, 1995 and June 30, 1998 were analyzed. During the study period, there were 285 reports involving death, 971 non-fatal serious reports (defined as events involving initial hospitalization, prolongation of hospitalization, life-threatening illness, or permanent disability), and 4,514 less serious reports after immunization with any pertussis-containing vaccine [15].
The whole-cell DTP vaccine has also been associated with acute encephalopathy [2]. A large case-control study that included children 2 to 35 months of age who received DTP was conducted in England to study the incidence of vaccine related neurological problems. Acute neurological disorders, such as encephalopathy or complicated convulsion(s) occurred in children who were more likely to have received the DTP vaccine 7 days preceding the onset than their age-matched controls. Among children presumed to be neurologically normal before entering the study, the relative risk (estimated by odds ratio) of a neurological illness occurring within 7-day period following receipt of DTP dose, compared to children not receiving DTP vaccine in the 7-day period before onset of their illness, was 3.3 (p< 0.001).
II-E. Hepatitis B vaccine
The database from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) in the USA that included 6,515 children less than six years of age who received the hepatitis B vaccine were analyzed to evaluate the vaccine related adverse reactions. Hepatitis B vaccine was found to be associated with prevalent arthritis, incident of acute ear infections, and incident of pharyngitis/nasopharangitis [16].
The above selected studies clearly show that the vaccines given to Greyson and Gwyneth cause serious health problems, even death in healthy children. These children were in perfect health and with no known risk of getting infections. However, they have risk of developing neurological damage from vaccines as it happened in their sister case.
Section III. Problems with the methods used by the health care provider who vaccinated Greyson and Gwyneth on May 12, 2004
Vaccines like other medicines, which are capable of causing serious health problems in children and adults as described above. The health care providers who are licensed to administer vaccines to children must have some knowledge in the area of adverse reactions to vaccines and the recommendations presented in the PDR and provided by the US CDC dealing with the administrations of these vaccines to children and adults.
My review of the evidence presented in this case has revealed the following serious problems dealing with a) the types and numbers of vaccines administered to Greyson and Gwyneth; b) the knowledge of the health care provider who administered vaccines to these children in the areas of adverse reactions to vaccines and the recommendations provided dealing with the use of these vaccines. Below is a list of the specific problems.
1) The health care provider administered eleven vaccines to each of these perfectly healthy children in one visit without doing analysis of risk and benefit or considering the synergistic actions among the components of these vaccines listed in Table 2 in causing health problems. These vaccines contain live viruses, various antigens, heavy metals, antibiotics, and preservatives. Additive and synergistic actions among these components in causing serious health problems can occur. I have evaluated four cases of children who died as a result of adverse reactions to vaccines [17, 18, 19]. I have also evaluated a case of a healthy adult who developed serous health from vaccines [20, 21].
2) The health care provider administered [Haemophilus influenzae Type b (Hib)] and Pneumococcal Conjugate vaccine (PCV) to Greyson and Gwyneth without any medical justifications. These vaccines have been approved and recommended only for children between 2 and 15 months of age. Greyson and Gwyneth are healthy and older than five years of age and giving them PCV and Hib does not follow the recommendations presented in the Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR) and provided by the US Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [3-6].
3) The health care provider did not evaluate the family case history prior to giving the children vaccines that may cause neurological damage such as DTaP and MMR to find out if they are at high risk of developing neurological problems. The children’s half-sister developed seizures and suffered from epilepsy after receiving her second MMR vaccine at the age of six years as described in this report. The CDC reported moderate and severe health problems in children after DTaP vaccine. These include seizure, high fever, serious allergic reactions, long-term seizures, comma, and permanent brain damage [22]. Furthermore, the following moderate and severe neurological and other health problems have been reported by the CDC in some children after MMR vaccines. These include seizure, joint pain, thrombocytopenia, serious allergic reactions, long-term seizures, deafness, coma, and permanent brain damage, deafness [23].
4) The health care provider did not consult with the mother of the children concerning vaccinating her children on May 12, 2004 and making the second appointment to vaccinate the children again a month later on June 12, 2004.
5) The health care provider did not consider the adverse reactions caused by the vaccines given when he made the decision to vaccinate the children again on June 12, 2004. Both Greyson and Gwyneth developed significant health problems and contact dermatitis after receiving the vaccines on May 12, 2004 as I described in Section I of this report. These symptoms should be taking in consideration when considering vaccinating these children again. Developing symptoms following the first exposure of individuals to antigens and chemicals present in vaccines indicate that these individuals are becoming sensitized to these agents. Exposure of these individuals again to these agents especially if it occurs within days or weeks may cause more serious illnesses than were induced by the previous exposure to these agents. Greyson and Gwyneth’s sister developed seizures following her second vaccination with MMR at six years of age. She was vaccinated with MMR as a toddler.
Section IV. Conclusions and Recommendation
Giving two healthy children eleven vaccines on a single visit without doing risk/benefit analysis or reviewing the family history for health problems caused by vaccines is not medically justified. In addition, giving these two children who are older than five years of age PCV and Hib vaccines that are recommended for children ages of 2-15 months indicates serous problems with the practices of the health care provider who administered these vaccines. I believe that the practices and the knowledge of this health care provider in the areas of vaccines and treatment of children should be evaluated by a medical board to avoid the occurrence of similar problems in the future.
Furthermore, below are my specific recommendations dealing with the issues of giving Greyson and Gwyneth vaccines in future and monitoring the damages caused by the vaccines given on May 12, 2004.
1) These children should not be given PCV and Hib vaccines again because these vaccines are approved and recommended for children at the ages of 2-15 months.
2) These children should not be vaccinated on June 12, 2004 or in the near future without assessing the damage caused by the vaccines given on May 12, 2004.
3) The medical records of their older sister who developed seizures after receiving the second dose of MMR at the age of 6 years should be evaluated prior to vaccinating these children. The sister’s medical records should be evaluated by an expert in the area of adverse reactions to vaccines to assess the risk of these children of developing serious neurological problems following vaccination.
4) The parents of these children and other caretakers should be consulted prior to giving these children vaccines and they should be given instructions to report adverse reactions to vaccines to the treating physicians.
5) The levels of aluminum and mercury should be determined in the urine and blood of Greyson and Gwyneth to get an idea about their exposure to these elements present in vaccines.
6) Greyson and Gwyneth should be evaluated by an allergist to determine their levels of sensitization to egg albumin and other components present in vaccines such as antibiotics, proteins, preservatives, and metals (Table 2).
7) Greyson and Gwyneth’s physician should be consulted to order blood analyses that include complete blood cells count (RBC, white blood count and differential cell counts, platelet count); liver and kidney functions panels; clotting factors; electrolyte levels; and glucose levels. These children suffered from dehydration and vaccines are known to cause thrombocytopenia, liver and kidney damage, and diabetes.
8) Greyson and Gwyneth should be evaluated by a neurologist and a hearing specialist to assess any neurological and hearing problem that may be caused by vaccines.
Mohammed Ali Al-Bayati
Ph.D., DABT, DABVT
Toxicologist and Pathologist
References
[1] Greyson and Gwyneth Hutchinson vaccination record on May 12, 2004.
[2] Physicians’ Desk Reference, Edition 53, 1999. Medical Economics Company, Inc, Montavale , NJ , USA .
[3] Physicians’ Desk Reference, Edition 57, 2003. Thomson PDR, Montavale , NJ , USA
[4] Vaccine Information Statement: Pneumococcal Conjugate vaccine. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, National Immunization Program. Pneumococcal Conjugate (9/30/2002).
[5] Vaccine Information Statement: Pneumococcal Polysacchride vaccine (PPV). U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, National Immunization Program. Pneumococcal (7/27/1997).
[6] Vaccine Information Statement: Haemophilus influenzae Type b (Hib) Vaccine. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, National Immunization Program. Hib (12/16/1998).
[7] Koga K, Kawashiro N, Araki A, Watanabe M. Bilateral acute profound deafness after MMR vaccination--report of a case. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 94(8):1142-5, 1991.
[8] Nabe-Nielsen J, Walter B. Unilateral total deafness as a complication of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination. Scand Audiol Suppl; 30:69-70; 1988.
[9] Stewart BJ, Prabhu PU. Reports of sensorineural deafness after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Arch Dis Child; 69(1):153-4, 1993.
[10] Miller E, Goldacre M, Pugh S, Colville A, Farrington P, Flower A, Nash J, MacFarlane L, Tettmar R. Risk of aseptic meningitis after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine in UK children. Lancet ; 341(8851):979-82, 1993.
[11] Sugiura A, Yamada A. Aseptic meningitis as a complication of mumps vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J.; 10(3):209-13, 1991.
[12] Stratton KR, Howe CJ, Johnston RB Jr. Adverse events associated with childhood vaccines other than pertussis and rubella. Summary of a report from the Institute of Medicine. JAMA; 271(20):1602-5, 1994.
[13] Classen JB, Classen DC . Clustering of cases of insulin dependent diabetes (IDDM) occurring three years after haemophilus influenza B (HiB) immunization support causal relationship between immunization and IDDM. Autoimmunity; 35(4):247-53, 2002.
[14] Classen JB, Classen DC . Clustering of cases of type 1 diabetes mellitus occurring 2- 4 years after vaccination is consistent with clustering after infections and progression to type 1 diabetes mellitus in autoantibody positive individuals. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab;16(4):495-508, 2003.
[15] Fisher MA, Eklund SA, James SA, and Lin X. Adverse Events Associated with Hepatitis B Vaccine in U.S. Children less than six years of age, 1993 and 1994. AEP vol. 11, No. 1, 13-21, 2001.
[16] Braun MM, Mootrey GT, Salive ME, Chen RT, Ellenberg SS. Infant immunization with acellular pertussis vaccines in the United States : assessment of the first two years' data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Pediatrics; 106(4):E51, 2000.
[17] Al-Bayati MA. Analysis of Causes That Led to Baby Lucas Alejandro Mullenax-Mendez’s Cardiac Arrest and Death in August-September of 2002 Medical Veritas, Volume 1, issue 1, pages 45-63. 2004. infusion
[18] Al-Bayati MA. Analysis of causes that led to Toddler Alexa Shearer’s cardiac arrest and death in November 1999. Medical Veritas, Volume 1, issue 1, pages 86-117, 2004. infusion
[19] Al-Bayati MA. Shaken baby syndrome or medical malpractice? Medical Veritas, Volume 1, issue 1, pages 78-90, 2004. infusion
[20] Al-Bayati MA. CAN YOU LOSE YOUR HAIR FROM A VACCINE?, 2003 [http://redflagsdaily.com/conferences/vaccines/sept20_Bayati.html]
[21] Al-Bayati MA. Severe hair loss induced by vaccines and reversed by the treatment with zinc. Medical Veritas, Volume 1, issue 2, in the press. infusion
[22] Vaccine Information Statement: Diphtheria Tetanus & Pertussis Vaccines. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, National Immunization Program. DTaP (7/30/2001).
[23] Vaccine Information Statement: Measles Mumps & Rubella vaccines. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, National Immunization Program. MMR (1/15/2003).
Though we spent nearly $30,000 on legal fees and were able to generate considerable sympathetic local media coverage, Hutchinson prevailed and was given the opportunity to vaccinate the children with the vaccines of his choice by the health care provider of his choice. This decision was based upon what a judge proclaimed to be a 'Public Policy' in the state of Arizona to vaccinate all children. The judge also stated that to rule otherwise would be to admit our government has committed child abuse for decades.
With a newly-obtained court order in hand and accompanied by three police cars, Hutchinson and a female accomplice whisked Gwyneth and Greyson away from their school and drove them to a nearby emergency health care clinic. Hutchinson tricked my children by telling them they were only going in for their first check up. Once inside, Hutchinson , along with a woman posing as my children's mother, authorized a health practitioner (D.O.) to administer cocktails of poisons into Greyson and Gwyneth's lymphatic systems. This 'cocktail' included the DTaP, IPV, MMR, Hib, Hep B, Varicella and PCV vaccines and were given to both children within less than an hour. These vaccines were recklessly combined and, adding insult to injury, two of the vaccines were age inappropriate and one vaccine was from a contaminated lot now known to be infected with BSE or mad cow disease. Virtually no consideration was given to our children's medical family history, which includes a primary family member (half-sister) who suffered from grand mal seizures for four years after being vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. This family history of seizures puts both of my children at a much greater risk of experiencing seizures than the general population.
It is beyond most people's comprehension how a few unqualified and grossly misguided people can persevere legally to have these toxic vaccines (that are non-emergency medicine) forced upon my children - literally gambling with their lives. And for what medical justification? None was provided. Our five-year-old son and nearly seven-year-old daughter are well past the ages of life-threatening consequences from any of the diseases these CDC-recommended vaccines were supposed to 'protect' them from. Greyson and Gwyneth had everything to lose by this insane proposition and nothing to gain.
Immunizations (an inaccurate term that leads one to believe that these vaccinations do something to safeguard our little ones from contracting 'scary' childhood diseases) are just one grand medical experiment. Time and again, vaccinations have been proven by researchers and non-special interest groups to be ineffective in preventing the spread of infectious diseases and unsafe with consequences ranging from minor irritation at the injection site to death. As a mom, I declared to the children's father and to the presiding judge that no one was going to subject my children to such a barbaric, unfounded experiment.
The judge exercised his authority to rule otherwise and with the slamming of a gavel, he delivered a ruling for which our children would pay dearly.
Approximately 48 hours after the hideous vaccination event May 12, 2004, I was finally able to see my children. I was overwhelmed at the sight of my two children completely dazed and suffering adverse effects such as dehydration, lethargy, dry heaves, headaches, burning eyes, sore throats and, of course, aching thighs with 'battle scars' from where needles were drug along my son's tiny legs as he fought to resist the poison that was being forced hypodermically into his body. Four months later, both Greyson and Gwyneth still show obvious signs of being vaccine damaged. Especially tragic for me is what I witness each day in our son, whose overall health and personality has changed dramatically. It is obvious to me that our son Greyson has been neurologically impaired as a result of being over-vaccinated and is in dire need of diagnostic and remedial care.
Instead of a ruling in favor of our motion requesting an “Emergency Stay” be put in place to prevent future vaccinations until I had the opportunity to get both children evaluated and treated for injuries from which they are still suffering, I am instead faced with obstacles placed before us by a judicial system that makes it nearly impossible to get my children medical care and, worse still, appears determined to order our children be re-vaccinated. To date, the court is ignoring the pleadings from several medical experts such as Dr. Russell Blaylock, Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati, Dr. Doris Rapp, Dr. Stuart Lanson and Dr. Rae – all who have testified that the odds of our two children suffering even more devastating consequences from additional vaccinations would be great and certainly a risk not worth taking.
Adding to the absurdity of my family's case, in July 2004, Hutchinson took me to court in an effort to find me in contempt for not allowing our children to leave with him on a cruise ship to some undisclosed destination off the continental U.S. just 72 hours after receiving 21 vaccinations—while both children were still obviously struggling with the physical and emotional aftermath of this traumatic event. The ruling was handed down three months later that I was indeed ruled to be in 'contempt' for my decision to follow my heart, good sense, the advise of medical experts and the recommendations of the CDC suggesting that long distance travel is not a prudent choice for at least three weeks following a child being vaccinated. This recent ruling will cost me upwards of $20,000 once all fines and fees have been paid. We are left with no choice but to appeal this decision to the Court of Appeals or higher. My attorney is confident that we will prevail once a reasonable judge who knows and enforces the laws of our state hears this case.
The injustices Greyson, Gwyneth, John and I have suffered are beyond anything I could have dreamed of. Now $30,000 later (my initial attorney fees) and six months down the road, the picture I see of the foreseeable future includes courts, attorneys, doctors and a strangely smirking man who used to be my husband; it also includes two children who have been needlessly damaged at the hands of a judge who empowered their reckless, malice-intending father to carry out the heinous act of forcing an overdose of contaminated and dangerous vaccines on our once perfectly healthy and bright children.
It is important to understand that our particular case here in Arizona is one of hundreds all over the country. This same plot is playing all over the nation and those who decide to make the informed choice to abstain from vaccination are subject to having their decision challenged in court by a non-custodial parent, legal guardian or a social worker. And, because the court is the state and the state is recommending the vaccines you wish to avoid, it is not difficult to predict which party will prevail in a child custody dispute where unvaccinated children and family court are involved.
We are laying a legal foundation that will allow this case to be heard in the Supreme Court of Arizona. If needed, we are prepared to go all the way to D.C.
But, more pressing on my heart today is the children's need for immediate medical attention. Dr. Rae in Dallas , Texas , has agreed to examine and treat both of my children in an effort to help them recover from the damage that has already been caused and to help ward off the potential for future health-related events and consequences. Dr. Rae is one of only three physicians who are equipped with a special piece of machinery that can efficiently diagnose the mechanisms in my son's brain that have been damaged. This vaccination related injury prevents Greyson's pupils from constricting naturally to light. The degree of immune compromise can also be determined and the appropriate remedial measures can be put in place.
If you are passionate about the rights of parents and children to abstain from state sanctioned medical experimentation and are in a position to contribute financially to our family's case/cause, make your check or money order payable to Wallace R. Nichols. If you prefer your donation be allocated towards the medical expenses involved in my children's aftercare, please indicate so in the memo area of your check or money order.
From the bottom of our hearts - Greyson, Gwyneth, John and I ..... THANK YOU.
In Unity there is Strength,
Janet Burton
P.O. Box 12042
Tempe , Arizona 85284
via [Vaccines and SIDS]
By Don Harkins
In their efforts to protect two children from family court-ordered vaccinations, Janet and John Burton of Tempe, Arizona, find themselves at center stage in a precedent-setting child custody case. At issue is plaintiff/parent Steven Hutchinson seeking a court order awarding him full custody of two children based on the mother's insistence that they be lawfully exempted from vaccination.
This case is exemplary of a national trend where hundreds, possibly thousands of divorced parents are punished by the state because their ex-spouses choose to use the vaccination issue as a means to gain the custodial upper hand. In many cases, as in the Burton case, one parent may be on record as agreeing with the other parent's non-vaccination position but changes their mind to enlist the court's help in undermining the other's access to the children.
Arizona District Judge Larry Grant of Maricopa county has ignored the Burton's evidence regarding the dangers of vaccines and upheld Hutchinson's desire that five-year-old Greyson and seven-year-old Gwyneth be vaccinated. Judge Grant further defied Janet's well-founded concerns by ordering that Hutchinson may determine what vaccines his children will receive and choose the practitioner who will deliver them.
Judge Grant's order was carried out May 12, 2004. The children were, "...physically restrained and forcefully vaccinated by a reckless, unprofessional 'health practitioner' who administered to them 21 vaccines in less than an hour. This 'kiddie cocktail' of mercury, aluminum, pathogenic viruses and more may have changed the course of my children's lives forever," Janet Burton explained.
Neither Hutchinson nor Judge Grant are licensed to prescribe medication in Arizona or any other state. However, armed with Judge Grant's court order, Hutchinson "prescribed" seven shots (DTaP, IPV, MMR, Hib, Hep B, Varicella and PCV—for a total of 21 vaccines) each for his children.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and its "catch-up" schedule, Gwyneth and Greyson should not have received the Hib and PCV shots because they were both past the age of five years. The osteopath Hutchinson used (who is licensed to prescribe medicines) administered the contraindicated vaccines per the judge's order.
Arizona VacLib Chapter Director Kim Medlin has conducted further research into the vaccines administered to Gwyneth and Greyson on May 12. Medlin has found that four of them came from what are called "hot lots"—batches of vaccines known to be causing unusually high numbers of adverse reactions. One of the vaccines is known to be contaminated with bovine spongiform encephalitis—also known as "mad cow" disease.
The Burtons have noticed that Gwyneth and Greyson's personalities have changed since the severe assault of 21 vaccines May 12 and that they are both more sickly. Janet believes the court is getting ready to order that her children be subjected to another round of vaccinations. Several qualified physicians have commented that the first round of vaccinations appear to have caused damage to these two children and concur that additional vaccinations at this time would do more harm than good.
Since this case was initiated by Hutchinson last March, Janet has forced the court to review much evidence regarding the dangers of vaccines. They have also enlisted the support of Drs. Muhammad Al-Bayati, Russell Blaylock and William Rae. Judge Grant has demonstrated that he has considered the information provided by Janet when stating for the record that he could not support their position because it would be an admission that, by recommending and ordering vaccines as a policy, the state of Arizona has been engaging in child abuse for decades.
The evidence supports Janet's claims that Hutchinson 's actions are purely vindictive and that he is using his children to punish his former wife for divorcing him last year. "This is the same man that just a few years ago sat me down in front of a computer monitor and proceeded to navigate around various websites in an effort to educate me on the hidden truths about all the risks and cover-ups associated with the 'experimental' surgical procedure we all loosely refer to today as childhood immunizations. Of course, as informed, responsible co-parents, we jointly agreed not to vaccinate our children. We made this decision and many other decisions such as birthing our children at home, breastfeeding each baby for a full year and a half and following up with a healthy, organic food plan thereafter. We also agreed that no pharmaceutical medications were to be given and, for certain, we would not mindlessly entrust our children to ignorant, drug-pushing doctors. All of these decisions seemed to serve our two children well as they truly epitomized wellness, vitality and brilliance. Both their father and I were proud of the positions we had taken on issues that pertained to our children's health and well-being and agreed to continue with what had worked (holistic methods of treatment) for our perfect children when we divorced. Together we outlined our beliefs concerning alternative methods of treatment for our children and made this part of our Parenting Plan—which is on file with the courts to this very day," Janet explained.
Among the documents before Judge Grant are reports of increased risk of adverse reactions in children who receive multiple antigens and letters stating that Gwyneth and Greyson are showing signs of vaccine damage. The Burton 's attorney Wallace Nichols is orchestrating a legal strategy intended to spare Gwyneth and Greyson another round of court-ordered vaccinations.
In the process of this child custody case being decided by Judge Grant, the court will be forced to consider the validity of state-recommended vaccination schedules against published science and the expert testimony of qualified neuroscientists, pathologists and medical doctors. And, if the Burtons are able to arrange for her children to undergo a full medical and biochemical analysis by Dr. Rae at the Environmental Health Center in Dallas (EHCD), Judge Grant will be forced to consider the possibility that vaccinations he ordered to appease the wishes of a man seeking retribution on his former spouse have caused two innocent children to suffer permanent injury.
The move will also force Hutchinson to legally "trump" the Burton 's medical evidence of vaccine damage by entering into the record an expert second opinion contradicting the findings of Dr. Rae's EHCD. Burton supporters believe Hutchinson will not be able to discredit the pending EHCD report.
"I will take this case as far as it will go," commented Janet who understands the huge implications this case will have in child custody disputes all over the nation.
The EHCD and the work of Dr. Rae in the field of environmental toxicology has come highly recommended by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and others. The cost for the series of tests to be run on both children is estimated at $3,000. Supporters are willing to supply room and board for the Burtons during the four days they will be in Dallas . The Burtons can use our help in this matter as attorney fees and lost wages are causing them to experience a significant degree of financial hardship.
Dr. Rae and the staff at EHCD have excellent credentials and utilize state-of-the-art diagnostic equipment and procedures to arrive at scientifically sound conclusions that stand up in court. To find out more about EHCD, the services it offers and references, go to www.ehcd.com
Vaccination Liberation, a national grassroots volunteer association, sees the huge implications of this case and has forwarded a $100 donation to the Burtons to help cover the cost of testing. Vaccination Liberation also requests that medical practitioners nationwide match their donation to this worthy cause.
via [Janet Burton]
Make a donation to the Greyson and Gwyneth Fund
For more information, contact Janet Burton at 480-785-4846.
The mailing address for donations and correspondence is
Janet Burton
P.O. Box 12042
Tempe , AZ 85284
